skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Archive
-
►
2010
(4)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (3)
-
►
2009
(77)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (9)
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (5)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (11)
- April 2009 (12)
- March 2009 (13)
- February 2009 (6)
- January 2009 (7)
-
▼
2008
(33)
- December 2008 (9)
- November 2008 (8)
- October 2008 (10)
- September 2008 (6)
License
© Steven Philippi
6 comments:
I write blog entries about things that are full of epic fail. If you're full of epic fail, then I'll write about you. I have not written about you. Thus, you must not be full of fail. That's logic, right bitches?
Get it Jeffrey?
Lol.
Um, failed logic. Whenever the conclusion is "Philippi is not full of epic fail" then there must be a fallacy somewhere in there.
Where do you draw this logic? Is it in your new philosophy book you are writing? I am looking forward to reading the draft soon.
So if I write philosophy about something not generally considered philosophical, is it still philosophy?
And you're gay.
I would consider linking logic to philosophy a break through. You should try it.
Post a Comment